Exclusive Interview with Mr. Hamza
Exclusive Interview with Mr. Hamza
By Rafa López – Cibercapitán
In a new installment of my ongoing series of interviews with controversial figures in the cyber world, today I bring you an exclusive conversation with Mr. Hamza, a self-proclaimed independent mind and voice of resistance in the hacktivist scene. Following my previous discussions with actors like Noname057(16) and Z-Pentest, this interview dives deep into the motivations, philosophy, and strategic evolution of one of the most enigmatic cyber figures currently active.
1. For those who don't know you yet, how do you define yourself and what cause do you support?
Mr. Hamza:
I am a free, independent mind not affiliated with any party. I'm not a hacker, but a researcher in the dynamics of control and cyber deterrence. The cause I believe in? Protecting peoples from oppression and exposing regimes that have built their power on the enslavement of others.
2. Who do you consider your main geopolitical enemy?
Mr. Hamza:
The enemy is not limited to geography. We do not operate from an "Eastern" or "Western" perspective; rather, we monitor systems of domination and subjugation. NATO? A tool. Israel? A facade. Europe? Continue. Whoever attacks the will of peoples and confiscates their identity is an enemy.
3. How far are you willing to take risks?
Mr. Hamza:
Risk is measured by the scales of morality and necessity. We do not target civilian lives, nor do we touch hospitals or emergency networks. But we do pressure the levers of control, the structures that manage tyranny and espionage.
4. Do you carry out hacking or data extraction operations?
Mr. Hamza:
We have the ability, and we have the choice. We don't need to talk about the tools; the results speak for themselves. Every operation has its time, and every file has its keys. We don't attack; we remind you that every regime has an end.
5. The visual symbolism of your publications has changed—have you changed your approach?
Mr. Hamza:
The image doesn't matter. As long as the cause is alive, the flag is not the monopoly of anyone. We are Moroccans, but we don't employ symbols to mobilize a false popular base. Our work is silent, but its resonance terrifies institutions.
6. What do you think of Morocco as an ally of America?
Mr. Hamza:
Morocco is a nation, while alliances are merely files. We don't confuse land with power. Morocco is not targeted, but rather purified of everything that distorts its sovereignty. Whoever wants Morocco to be subservient will know that we are the ones who cannot be bought.
7. How do you classify yourselves? Pro-Palestine? Pro-Russia? Anti-Israel?
Mr. Hamza:
We support justice. We do not defend geography, but rather the right of peoples to self-determination. Palestine is not a matter of fact, but a living wound. Israel is an illegitimate project of supremacy. As for Russia? We know its interests, and we deal with them in a balanced manner.
8. Are you comfortable working with groups with conflicting orientations?
Mr. Hamza:
In times of war, those who do not unite in peace come together. Cyber alliances are alliances of goals, not ideologies. We have a common enemy, so let each act from their own perspective. As for principles? We do not compromise on them.
9. Do you expect a coordinated escalation against Israel after the recent attacks on Iran?
Mr. Hamza:
What is sown comes to fruition. Every aggression generates an echo, and every stab produces anger. Israel is paying the price for its arrogance, and what is to come is greater.
10. Why do you attack Spain despite its position on Palestine?
Mr. Hamza:
Double standards are unforgivable. Anyone who condemns the killing of children in Gaza and supports sanctions against peoples seeking their sovereignty is a political hypocrite. Spain plays both sides, and we cut both ends.
11. What is the secret to your high success in DDoS campaigns?
Mr. Hamza:
It's not just the tools, but a deep understanding of the nature of defenses, zero hour, and attacking from unconventional angles. The enemy uses static techniques, and we use intelligence and context.
12. What do you think of other groups?
Mr. Hamza:
We respect those who work silently, and we monitor those who talk too much. Some are fighters, and some are unwitting tools. In cyber warfare, reputations are built on actions, not slogans.
13. What is more important: the attacks themselves or the psychological impact?
Mr. Hamza:
The most powerful weapon is the subliminal message. Servers can be fixed, but fear is not easily restored. When a country is in turmoil, it's more than a breach; it's an earthquake.
14. Final message?
Mr. Hamza:
We’re not here for the spotlight, but for the truth. To all who think the world goes their way, know that there are those silently watching you... and whoever doesn't have a bomb, has an idea... and once an idea ignites, it won't be extinguished.
Operation Eastwood and Beyond
On the post-Eastwood phase and collective response:
What happened was not a disruption — it was a calibration.
Operation Eastwood reminded the community of a fundamental truth: resilience is not built on platforms, but on alignment.
We do not mourn systems — we shift vectors.
We stand with Noname057(16) and any group facing coercion. Our solidarity is not loud — it’s precise, distributed, and effective. The answer to force is not fury — it's coordination.
We act when silence becomes a weapon.
On the evolution from DDoS to intrusion-based strategies:
Noise creates headlines. Access changes balance.
While DDoS remains a signal — intrusive operations define a new terrain.
For us, pivoting to intrusion wasn't a decision. It was an inevitability.
Every port, every unsecured token, every unpatched instance — these are not gaps. They are invitations.
We’re not transitioning — we already operate at that layer. Quietly. Relentlessly.
On international arrests and legal pressure:
Criminalizing dissent is a technique as old as power itself.
The ecosystem is decentralized — remove one entity, five more adapt.
These arrests are tactical illusions, orchestrated to reassure vulnerable infrastructures and suppress uncomfortable truths.
But ideas are not bound by borders or fingerprints.
The architecture of resistance is adaptive, multilingual, and stateless.
On internal development vs purchasing DDoS tools:
When you buy a platform, you inherit its limitations — and its surveillance.
When you build your own, you define the battlefield.
Our code reflects our philosophy: lean, lethal, and loyal to nothing but efficiency.
Our tools are not for sale. They’re not for display.
They’re extensions of our intent — and our intent is sovereignty through mastery.
— Mr. Hamza
Independent, unsubservient, uncompromising, unforgiving.
You can watch the video Interview
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario